HOME: Bible Archaeology           David & Goliath         The Composite Bow           Military Architecture           Armour




The Army


Military Engineering




Extra Websites

















Stone Tablets














Landscape photograph of Mount Tabor and the plain below it, with a large town and fertile crops below it

Mount Tabor and the plain below, scene of the battle between Deborah/Barak's forces and Sisera, the fearsome general of King Jabor of Hazor (see Judges 4 and 5). King Jabor and his general Sisera counted on their iron-wheeled chariots, which were effective on the flat plain below Mount Tabor. What they did not foresee was the torrential rain that turned the ground into a quagmire, and gave the lightly armed Israelites the advantage. 
For more information on Deborah and the battle, see
Deborah and Barak: Battle

Map showing the first phase of the battle between Deborah's forces and Sisera

Plan of the first phase of the battle between Deborah's forces and Sisera. 
1: Sisera's base camp; 2: Deborah and Barak concentrate their forces on Mt. Tabor; 3: Sisera moves to invest Mt. Tabor; 4: the second Israelite force concentrates near the northern slopes of Mt. Ephraim. From 'Battles of the Bible', Chaim Herzog and Mordechai Gishon


The Bible has no great set-piece battles like those of Alexander or Napoleon - if they happened, the Bible does not describe them, or at least not in detail. Very little is known about the deployment of troops during any  particular battle - the Bible describes the reasons for the battle, who was involved, and what the result was, but it tells us virtually nothing of the strategies used by the opposing generals.

Cache of slingshots excavated at the archaeological site of Lachish

A cache of slingshots found 
in the ruins of Lachish

Before the reign of David, fighting took the form of skirmishes or raids. In this early period, the Israelites were experts at guerilla fighting. They relied on surprise attacks to panic their enemies.

These battles fall into the following two groups - roughly before the reign of David, and after it:

Before David and the establishment of a monarchy:

  •  the campaigns of Joshua, Book of Joshua

  •  the wars described in the Book of Judges: Ehud versus the Moabite king Eglon (Judges 3:12-30); Deborah and Barak versus Jabin of Hazor and his general Sisera (Judges 4 and 5); Gideon versus the Midianites (Judges 7:1-25); Samson versus the Philistines (Judges 13:1-16:31). These were all defensive battles fought with tribal militia. The battles were more like extended skirmishes, lasting minutes to hours - short, sharp, swift.

From the time of King Saul to the Exile

  •  Saul's war with the Philistines, and David's conquests

  • Israel under two great military kings, Omri and Ahab; Battle of Qarqar

  • battle against the Egyptians at Megiddo, King Josiah killed

  • the siege of Samaria, and conquest by Sargon II of Assyria after a three-year siege. 




David Slays Goliath, by Caravaggio

When David went out to fight Goliath, he was armed with nothing but a sling and his wits. Read about David's use of lateral thinking at Bible Top Ten Young People.  Later when he became king, he took care to organize and equip an army that would have a better chance of defeating its enemy.

Greek body armour

Still from the film "Troy" showing Achilles in full body armour

No Israelite armor has been found, but this Greek armor (left)  shows body protection for a soldier in the mid 1st millennium BC; an elite soldier (right) would have stronger, more efficient armor

Artist's impression of the multi-chambered gates of Gezer

This reconstruction of the gates of Gezer shows the guard-rooms built into the wall. Every city and town was protected by permanent guards at the gates. Fighting equipment was also kept here.


In the early part of Israel's history, each tribe provided a militia from its able-bodied men. This group was willing and able to fight, and had received some training. They were not a regular army as we understand the term, not full-time soldiers, but men who were called on to defend their clan whenever there was a need - somewhat like the men who fought for Scotland in the Battle of Culloden. 

In the battle scenes in the film 'Braveheart', William Wallace led a federation of clans/tribes. Each clan could leave or change sides if they wished. That was the pattern for the Israelite army. The tribes were often motivated by self-interest, which is fair enough if the men were going to face death in battle. 

But this system could be a problem for a leader trying to muster a large force and hold it together. The advantage of militia is that the men will fight passionately for their home and families. The disadvantage is that they cannot be held for long-term wars or fighting. At harvest time, for example, men often simply downed their weapons and returned home to bring in the harvest. 

Stone wall relief showing fully armed slingers in an ancient army

It was clear to the Israelites that a well-trained, well-equipped army had the advantage 
over tribal militia, however brave and resourceful these part-time soldiers might be

Despite their undoubted courage, the tribal militias were not really successful. Their enemies, such as the Philistines, were well-organized - 1 Samuel 4:2 tells us that the Philistines were drawn up in lines when they attacked Israel, which suggests a disciplined, well-trained enemy. As well, the Israelites were poorly equipped, with little or no armour.

When King Saul, and then King David and his son King Solomon took the throne, there was a dramatic change. These kings began to copy the strategies of their enemies. They formed regular armies with full-time trained soldiers. They used new strategies and tactics, things that they could see worked well for their enemies - for example, laying siege to a city. But they also held onto the tactics that had worked for them before: surprise attacks, psychological warfare, propaganda.

Very little is known about the organization of the army under the Israelite kings. When the Bible speaks of soldiers in 'thousands', it does not mean numerically thousands, but is instead a term describing a unit of soldiers. Unfortunately, we do not know how many soldiers would have been in one of these units - but certainly it would have been much, much less than a numerical 'thousand'.





Photograph of a boy hurling a stone with a sling

A boy with a sling-shot

Bronze sword, with a curved blade

Canaanite straight swords

Canaanite sickle sword and straight swords

Chariot and two soldiers, one using a bow and arrow, the other driving; their chariot has thick, possibly iron wheels, and there is a dog running beside the chariot's horse

A iron-wheeled chariot, probably of similar design to the chariots used by Sisera's forces. 
See the story of chariots at   Warfare: Chariots   or 
  Warfare: Armour


Different types of metal weapons; originally they would have had wooden handles

Assorted metal weapons

There were four branches in the army: spearmen, swordsmen, archers, and slingers. Weapons used by these groups can be divided into two groups: those the soldier held and wielded at close quarters with the enemy, and those he projected, either with his arm or with the the help of some other centrifugal force, for example the sling.

There are few references to weapons in the period of the Judges, or in the battles that were fought then - no Israelite spears, bows, shields, javelins, axes or maces - or the protective body armor (see Judges 5:8). Their enemies, on the other hand, were well armed - Goliath had a full suit of armor.

After the introduction of monarchy by Saul, David and Solomon, weapons became much more common. The standing army was equipped with effective weapons, and when the Philistine control over the manufacture of metal was broken, the weapons industry of Israel came under the control of the king.

Hand held weapons included the sword, the mace or club, and spears and javelins. Projectile weapons using centrifugal force included the bow and arrow, and the sling. The slingers were probably more accurate at hitting their target than the archers.

Aerial view of the tel at Lachish, showing the siege ramp built by the Assyrians

An aerial view of the tel of Lachish. The siege ramp is clearly visible at the bottom right of the tel. The excavated remains of the royal palace are in the centre of the tel.

Wall relief showing archers, siege machines and the chains used to dislodge them, and sappers

A siege machine used by Sennacherib against the walls of Lachish



Sun Tzu, the great Chinese war tactician, said 'The worst policy is to attack cities. Attack them only when there is no alternative.' He knew that attacking, or even laying siege to a city, was expensive and time-consuming, so he did not favor it. 

But siege warfare was the method Joshua frequently used in the story of the infiltration of Canaan, since he lacked the numbers to face an enemy in an open battle. Siege warfare was practised by Abimelech at Shechem, and Jephtah also used it in Ammon.

It was expensive and time-consuming, but effective. The great empires of the ancient Near East perfected this type of warfare. The Assyrians developed specialized storm troops who were able to take advantage of any breaches in the wall. Trained sappers built zig-zag trenches allowing their own soldiers to get closer to the walls of the besieged city, without being hit by missiles coming from the city. Their engineers developed new siege weapons such as covered battering rams and mining tools.

Wall relief from the palace at Nimrud; Assyrian soldiers attack Lachish with a battering ram, scaling ladders, archers and psychological warfare - see the impaled captives

Wall relief from the palace of Nimrud, showing Assyrian soldiers attacking the city of Lachish. Note the sappers undermining the wall foundations, the impaled captives, the battering ram and the archers armed with composite bows

Artist's impression of the Assyrian attack on Lachish

This drawing captures something of the chaos of an attack on a walled city - 
in this case, Lachish

The attackers would seal off the city under attack by encircling it with their army. The soldiers would settle down to work, but it was a busy time for the engineers, who would begin building siege works.  An earthen wall might be built to encircle the city; it would have guard towers at regular intervals, to keep watch for breakouts. Siege ramps made of earth and wood would be built (see above right) as soon as the battering rams were ready for use. 

Unless relief came from outside, the inhabitants of the city were trapped. All they could look forward to was starvation, surrender, slavery or death - and probably a horrible death at that. Jeremiah describes some of the terrible things that happened during a siege: 'I will make them eat the flesh of their sons and their daughters, and everyone shall eat the flesh of his neighbor in the siege (19:9). And Isaiah comments that 'their corpses were as refuse in the midst of the streets' (5:25)

Wall relief showing the treatment of captives from the city of Lachish

Defeated captives being led into captivity, or worse

See Military Architecture in the Bible: Lachish for the story of the siege.



Unfortunately for Israel it lay at a strategic crossroad, straddling major trade routes and wedged between two great empires, Sumeria/Assyria and Egypt. So it often became a battlefield when foreign troops passed through on their way to somewhere else. 

War was part of life in ancient Israel, though the way it was waged changed drastically in the time between 1300-586BC. At first the soldiers were voluntary militia, then later became an organized and disciplined army. Finally, some thirty or forty years after the death of Christ, they were a desperate, defensive force against the Roman invaders. 

'For everything there is a season....... a time for war, and a time for peace. (Ecclesiastes 3.1-8.)

See Bible Top Ten Warriors for the Bible's most valiant soldiers.

See other fascinating links between 
Archaeology and the Bible



  War  - Old Testament  - Archaeology of The Bible - Bible  Study Resource: The Army, Battles, Weapons and Military Engineering in the Bible


   Home                                     FAQs                                        About the Author